Commit 9f7118b2 authored by Alexey Dobriyan's avatar Alexey Dobriyan Committed by Linus Torvalds
Browse files

proc: don't use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE for /proc/*/fail-nth

READ_ONCE and WRITE_ONCE are useless when there is only one read/write
is being made.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171120204033.GA9446@avx2


Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent e3912ac3
......@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ static ssize_t proc_fail_nth_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
task = get_proc_task(file_inode(file));
if (!task)
return -ESRCH;
WRITE_ONCE(task->fail_nth, n);
task->fail_nth = n;
put_task_struct(task);
return count;
......@@ -1386,8 +1386,7 @@ static ssize_t proc_fail_nth_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
task = get_proc_task(file_inode(file));
if (!task)
return -ESRCH;
len = snprintf(numbuf, sizeof(numbuf), "%u\n",
READ_ONCE(task->fail_nth));
len = snprintf(numbuf, sizeof(numbuf), "%u\n", task->fail_nth);
len = simple_read_from_buffer(buf, count, ppos, numbuf, len);
put_task_struct(task);
......
Supports Markdown
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment