Commit 8b37bc27 authored by Jiufei Xue's avatar Jiufei Xue Committed by Jens Axboe
Browse files

iocost: check active_list of all the ancestors in iocg_activate()

There is a bug that checking the same active_list over and over again
in iocg_activate(). The intention of the code was checking whether all
the ancestors and self have already been activated. So fix it.

Fixes: 7caa4715

 ("blkcg: implement blk-iocost")
Acked-by: default avatarTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJiufei Xue <jiufei.xue@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
parent 478de338
......@@ -1057,9 +1057,12 @@ static bool iocg_activate(struct ioc_gq *iocg, struct ioc_now *now)
atomic64_set(&iocg->active_period, cur_period);
/* already activated or breaking leaf-only constraint? */
for (i = iocg->level; i > 0; i--)
if (!list_empty(&iocg->active_list))
if (!list_empty(&iocg->active_list))
goto succeed_unlock;
for (i = iocg->level - 1; i > 0; i--)
if (!list_empty(&iocg->ancestors[i]->active_list))
goto fail_unlock;
if (iocg->child_active_sum)
goto fail_unlock;
......@@ -1101,6 +1104,7 @@ static bool iocg_activate(struct ioc_gq *iocg, struct ioc_now *now)
ioc_start_period(ioc, now);
}
succeed_unlock:
spin_unlock_irq(&ioc->lock);
return true;
......
Supports Markdown
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment