Commit cba328fc authored by Tetsuo Handa's avatar Tetsuo Handa Committed by David S. Miller
Browse files

filter: Optimize instruction revalidation code.



Since repeating u16 value to u8 value conversion using switch() clause's
case statement is wasteful, this patch introduces u16 to u8 mapping table
and removes most of case statements. As a result, the size of net/core/filter.o
is reduced by about 29% on x86.
Signed-off-by: default avatarTetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Acked-by: default avatarEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 9e50e3ac
......@@ -383,7 +383,57 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sk_run_filter);
*/
int sk_chk_filter(struct sock_filter *filter, int flen)
{
struct sock_filter *ftest;
/*
* Valid instructions are initialized to non-0.
* Invalid instructions are initialized to 0.
*/
static const u8 codes[] = {
[BPF_ALU|BPF_ADD|BPF_K] = BPF_S_ALU_ADD_K + 1,
[BPF_ALU|BPF_ADD|BPF_X] = BPF_S_ALU_ADD_X + 1,
[BPF_ALU|BPF_SUB|BPF_K] = BPF_S_ALU_SUB_K + 1,
[BPF_ALU|BPF_SUB|BPF_X] = BPF_S_ALU_SUB_X + 1,
[BPF_ALU|BPF_MUL|BPF_K] = BPF_S_ALU_MUL_K + 1,
[BPF_ALU|BPF_MUL|BPF_X] = BPF_S_ALU_MUL_X + 1,
[BPF_ALU|BPF_DIV|BPF_X] = BPF_S_ALU_DIV_X + 1,
[BPF_ALU|BPF_AND|BPF_K] = BPF_S_ALU_AND_K + 1,
[BPF_ALU|BPF_AND|BPF_X] = BPF_S_ALU_AND_X + 1,
[BPF_ALU|BPF_OR|BPF_K] = BPF_S_ALU_OR_K + 1,
[BPF_ALU|BPF_OR|BPF_X] = BPF_S_ALU_OR_X + 1,
[BPF_ALU|BPF_LSH|BPF_K] = BPF_S_ALU_LSH_K + 1,
[BPF_ALU|BPF_LSH|BPF_X] = BPF_S_ALU_LSH_X + 1,
[BPF_ALU|BPF_RSH|BPF_K] = BPF_S_ALU_RSH_K + 1,
[BPF_ALU|BPF_RSH|BPF_X] = BPF_S_ALU_RSH_X + 1,
[BPF_ALU|BPF_NEG] = BPF_S_ALU_NEG + 1,
[BPF_LD|BPF_W|BPF_ABS] = BPF_S_LD_W_ABS + 1,
[BPF_LD|BPF_H|BPF_ABS] = BPF_S_LD_H_ABS + 1,
[BPF_LD|BPF_B|BPF_ABS] = BPF_S_LD_B_ABS + 1,
[BPF_LD|BPF_W|BPF_LEN] = BPF_S_LD_W_LEN + 1,
[BPF_LD|BPF_W|BPF_IND] = BPF_S_LD_W_IND + 1,
[BPF_LD|BPF_H|BPF_IND] = BPF_S_LD_H_IND + 1,
[BPF_LD|BPF_B|BPF_IND] = BPF_S_LD_B_IND + 1,
[BPF_LD|BPF_IMM] = BPF_S_LD_IMM + 1,
[BPF_LDX|BPF_W|BPF_LEN] = BPF_S_LDX_W_LEN + 1,
[BPF_LDX|BPF_B|BPF_MSH] = BPF_S_LDX_B_MSH + 1,
[BPF_LDX|BPF_IMM] = BPF_S_LDX_IMM + 1,
[BPF_MISC|BPF_TAX] = BPF_S_MISC_TAX + 1,
[BPF_MISC|BPF_TXA] = BPF_S_MISC_TXA + 1,
[BPF_RET|BPF_K] = BPF_S_RET_K + 1,
[BPF_RET|BPF_A] = BPF_S_RET_A + 1,
[BPF_ALU|BPF_DIV|BPF_K] = BPF_S_ALU_DIV_K + 1,
[BPF_LD|BPF_MEM] = BPF_S_LD_MEM + 1,
[BPF_LDX|BPF_MEM] = BPF_S_LDX_MEM + 1,
[BPF_ST] = BPF_S_ST + 1,
[BPF_STX] = BPF_S_STX + 1,
[BPF_JMP|BPF_JA] = BPF_S_JMP_JA + 1,
[BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K] = BPF_S_JMP_JEQ_K + 1,
[BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_X] = BPF_S_JMP_JEQ_X + 1,
[BPF_JMP|BPF_JGE|BPF_K] = BPF_S_JMP_JGE_K + 1,
[BPF_JMP|BPF_JGE|BPF_X] = BPF_S_JMP_JGE_X + 1,
[BPF_JMP|BPF_JGT|BPF_K] = BPF_S_JMP_JGT_K + 1,
[BPF_JMP|BPF_JGT|BPF_X] = BPF_S_JMP_JGT_X + 1,
[BPF_JMP|BPF_JSET|BPF_K] = BPF_S_JMP_JSET_K + 1,
[BPF_JMP|BPF_JSET|BPF_X] = BPF_S_JMP_JSET_X + 1,
};
int pc;
if (flen == 0 || flen > BPF_MAXINSNS)
......@@ -391,136 +441,31 @@ int sk_chk_filter(struct sock_filter *filter, int flen)
/* check the filter code now */
for (pc = 0; pc < flen; pc++) {
ftest = &filter[pc];
/* Only allow valid instructions */
switch (ftest->code) {
case BPF_ALU|BPF_ADD|BPF_K:
ftest->code = BPF_S_ALU_ADD_K;
break;
case BPF_ALU|BPF_ADD|BPF_X:
ftest->code = BPF_S_ALU_ADD_X;
break;
case BPF_ALU|BPF_SUB|BPF_K:
ftest->code = BPF_S_ALU_SUB_K;
break;
case BPF_ALU|BPF_SUB|BPF_X:
ftest->code = BPF_S_ALU_SUB_X;
break;
case BPF_ALU|BPF_MUL|BPF_K:
ftest->code = BPF_S_ALU_MUL_K;
break;
case BPF_ALU|BPF_MUL|BPF_X:
ftest->code = BPF_S_ALU_MUL_X;
break;
case BPF_ALU|BPF_DIV|BPF_X:
ftest->code = BPF_S_ALU_DIV_X;
break;
case BPF_ALU|BPF_AND|BPF_K:
ftest->code = BPF_S_ALU_AND_K;
break;
case BPF_ALU|BPF_AND|BPF_X:
ftest->code = BPF_S_ALU_AND_X;
break;
case BPF_ALU|BPF_OR|BPF_K:
ftest->code = BPF_S_ALU_OR_K;
break;
case BPF_ALU|BPF_OR|BPF_X:
ftest->code = BPF_S_ALU_OR_X;
break;
case BPF_ALU|BPF_LSH|BPF_K:
ftest->code = BPF_S_ALU_LSH_K;
break;
case BPF_ALU|BPF_LSH|BPF_X:
ftest->code = BPF_S_ALU_LSH_X;
break;
case BPF_ALU|BPF_RSH|BPF_K:
ftest->code = BPF_S_ALU_RSH_K;
break;
case BPF_ALU|BPF_RSH|BPF_X:
ftest->code = BPF_S_ALU_RSH_X;
break;
case BPF_ALU|BPF_NEG:
ftest->code = BPF_S_ALU_NEG;
break;
case BPF_LD|BPF_W|BPF_ABS:
ftest->code = BPF_S_LD_W_ABS;
break;
case BPF_LD|BPF_H|BPF_ABS:
ftest->code = BPF_S_LD_H_ABS;
break;
case BPF_LD|BPF_B|BPF_ABS:
ftest->code = BPF_S_LD_B_ABS;
break;
case BPF_LD|BPF_W|BPF_LEN:
ftest->code = BPF_S_LD_W_LEN;
break;
case BPF_LD|BPF_W|BPF_IND:
ftest->code = BPF_S_LD_W_IND;
break;
case BPF_LD|BPF_H|BPF_IND:
ftest->code = BPF_S_LD_H_IND;
break;
case BPF_LD|BPF_B|BPF_IND:
ftest->code = BPF_S_LD_B_IND;
break;
case BPF_LD|BPF_IMM:
ftest->code = BPF_S_LD_IMM;
break;
case BPF_LDX|BPF_W|BPF_LEN:
ftest->code = BPF_S_LDX_W_LEN;
break;
case BPF_LDX|BPF_B|BPF_MSH:
ftest->code = BPF_S_LDX_B_MSH;
break;
case BPF_LDX|BPF_IMM:
ftest->code = BPF_S_LDX_IMM;
break;
case BPF_MISC|BPF_TAX:
ftest->code = BPF_S_MISC_TAX;
break;
case BPF_MISC|BPF_TXA:
ftest->code = BPF_S_MISC_TXA;
break;
case BPF_RET|BPF_K:
ftest->code = BPF_S_RET_K;
break;
case BPF_RET|BPF_A:
ftest->code = BPF_S_RET_A;
break;
struct sock_filter *ftest = &filter[pc];
u16 code = ftest->code;
if (code >= ARRAY_SIZE(codes))
return -EINVAL;
code = codes[code];
/* Undo the '+ 1' in codes[] after validation. */
if (!code--)
return -EINVAL;
/* Some instructions need special checks */
switch (code) {
case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_K:
/* check for division by zero */
case BPF_ALU|BPF_DIV|BPF_K:
if (ftest->k == 0)
return -EINVAL;
ftest->code = BPF_S_ALU_DIV_K;
break;
/* check for invalid memory addresses */
case BPF_LD|BPF_MEM:
if (ftest->k >= BPF_MEMWORDS)
return -EINVAL;
ftest->code = BPF_S_LD_MEM;
break;
case BPF_LDX|BPF_MEM:
if (ftest->k >= BPF_MEMWORDS)
return -EINVAL;
ftest->code = BPF_S_LDX_MEM;
break;
case BPF_ST:
if (ftest->k >= BPF_MEMWORDS)
return -EINVAL;
ftest->code = BPF_S_ST;
break;
case BPF_STX:
case BPF_S_LD_MEM:
case BPF_S_LDX_MEM:
case BPF_S_ST:
case BPF_S_STX:
/* check for invalid memory addresses */
if (ftest->k >= BPF_MEMWORDS)
return -EINVAL;
ftest->code = BPF_S_STX;
break;
case BPF_JMP|BPF_JA:
case BPF_S_JMP_JA:
/*
* Note, the large ftest->k might cause loops.
* Compare this with conditional jumps below,
......@@ -528,40 +473,7 @@ int sk_chk_filter(struct sock_filter *filter, int flen)
*/
if (ftest->k >= (unsigned)(flen-pc-1))
return -EINVAL;
ftest->code = BPF_S_JMP_JA;
break;
case BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K:
ftest->code = BPF_S_JMP_JEQ_K;
break;
case BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_X:
ftest->code = BPF_S_JMP_JEQ_X;
break;
case BPF_JMP|BPF_JGE|BPF_K:
ftest->code = BPF_S_JMP_JGE_K;
break;
case BPF_JMP|BPF_JGE|BPF_X:
ftest->code = BPF_S_JMP_JGE_X;
break;
case BPF_JMP|BPF_JGT|BPF_K:
ftest->code = BPF_S_JMP_JGT_K;
break;
case BPF_JMP|BPF_JGT|BPF_X:
ftest->code = BPF_S_JMP_JGT_X;
break;
case BPF_JMP|BPF_JSET|BPF_K:
ftest->code = BPF_S_JMP_JSET_K;
break;
case BPF_JMP|BPF_JSET|BPF_X:
ftest->code = BPF_S_JMP_JSET_X;
break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
/* for conditionals both must be safe */
switch (ftest->code) {
case BPF_S_JMP_JEQ_K:
case BPF_S_JMP_JEQ_X:
case BPF_S_JMP_JGE_K:
......@@ -570,10 +482,13 @@ int sk_chk_filter(struct sock_filter *filter, int flen)
case BPF_S_JMP_JGT_X:
case BPF_S_JMP_JSET_X:
case BPF_S_JMP_JSET_K:
/* for conditionals both must be safe */
if (pc + ftest->jt + 1 >= flen ||
pc + ftest->jf + 1 >= flen)
return -EINVAL;
break;
}
ftest->code = code;
}
/* last instruction must be a RET code */
......@@ -581,10 +496,8 @@ int sk_chk_filter(struct sock_filter *filter, int flen)
case BPF_S_RET_K:
case BPF_S_RET_A:
return 0;
break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
}
return -EINVAL;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(sk_chk_filter);
......
Supports Markdown
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment