Commit e080e9d6 authored by Jason Uhlenkott's avatar Jason Uhlenkott Committed by Linus Torvalds
Browse files

[PATCH] x86_64: Don't claim too many vectors for TLB flushing



It looks like the new scalable TLB flush code for x86_64 is claiming
one more IRQ vector than it actually uses.

Signed-off-by: default avatarJason Uhlenkott <jasonuhl@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
parent 5b22a385
......@@ -46,8 +46,6 @@ struct hw_interrupt_type;
* some of the following vectors are 'rare', they are merged
* into a single vector (CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR) to save vector space.
* TLB, reschedule and local APIC vectors are performance-critical.
*
* Vectors 0xf0-0xf9 are free (reserved for future Linux use).
*/
#define SPURIOUS_APIC_VECTOR 0xff
#define ERROR_APIC_VECTOR 0xfe
......@@ -56,8 +54,9 @@ struct hw_interrupt_type;
#define KDB_VECTOR 0xfb /* reserved for KDB */
#define THERMAL_APIC_VECTOR 0xfa
#define THRESHOLD_APIC_VECTOR 0xf9
#define INVALIDATE_TLB_VECTOR_END 0xf8
#define INVALIDATE_TLB_VECTOR_START 0xf0 /* f0-f8 used for TLB flush */
/* f8 free */
#define INVALIDATE_TLB_VECTOR_END 0xf7
#define INVALIDATE_TLB_VECTOR_START 0xf0 /* f0-f7 used for TLB flush */
#define NUM_INVALIDATE_TLB_VECTORS 8
......
Supports Markdown
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment