Commit e2726020 authored by Dmitry Ivanov's avatar Dmitry Ivanov Committed by David S. Miller
Browse files

netlink: don't send NETLINK_URELEASE for unbound sockets



All existing users of NETLINK_URELEASE use it to clean up resources that
were previously allocated to a socket via some command. As a result, no
users require getting this notification for unbound sockets.

Sending it for unbound sockets, however, is a problem because any user
(including unprivileged users) can create a socket that uses the same ID
as an existing socket. Binding this new socket will fail, but if the
NETLINK_URELEASE notification is generated for such sockets, the users
thereof will be tricked into thinking the socket that they allocated the
resources for is closed.

In the nl80211 case, this will cause destruction of virtual interfaces
that still belong to an existing hostapd process; this is the case that
Dmitry noticed. In the NFC case, it will cause a poll abort. In the case
of netlink log/queue it will cause them to stop reporting events, as if
NFULNL_CFG_CMD_UNBIND/NFQNL_CFG_CMD_UNBIND had been called.

Fix this problem by checking that the socket is bound before generating
the NETLINK_URELEASE notification.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: default avatarDmitry Ivanov <dima@ubnt.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent a36a0d40
......@@ -688,7 +688,7 @@ static int netlink_release(struct socket *sock)
skb_queue_purge(&sk->sk_write_queue);
if (nlk->portid) {
if (nlk->portid && nlk->bound) {
struct netlink_notify n = {
.net = sock_net(sk),
.protocol = sk->sk_protocol,
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment