1. 10 Sep, 2019 2 commits
  2. 28 Aug, 2019 1 commit
  3. 27 Aug, 2019 4 commits
  4. 15 Aug, 2019 1 commit
  5. 09 Aug, 2019 2 commits
  6. 08 Aug, 2019 1 commit
  7. 02 Jul, 2019 1 commit
  8. 18 Jun, 2019 3 commits
  9. 08 Jun, 2019 1 commit
  10. 22 May, 2019 3 commits
  11. 21 May, 2019 1 commit
  12. 13 May, 2019 1 commit
  13. 15 Apr, 2019 1 commit
  14. 20 Mar, 2019 1 commit
  15. 26 Feb, 2019 2 commits
  16. 21 Feb, 2019 1 commit
  17. 19 Feb, 2019 3 commits
  18. 14 Feb, 2019 1 commit
  19. 08 Feb, 2019 1 commit
    • Johan Hovold's avatar
      dt-bindings: regulator: update fixed-regulator example · b735f41d
      Johan Hovold authored and Mark Brown's avatar Mark Brown committed
      
      
      Fixed regulators do not have associated bus addresses and are typically
      placed directly under the root node where their names must still be
      unique despite not having a unit address.
      
      Fix the malformed example node which had a unit address but no "reg"
      property by dropping the unit address.
      
      Also, try to make the example more useful by using the recommended
      generic node name "regulator", but with a suffix reflecting the
      regulator name in order to make it unique.
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJohan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: Mark Brown's avatarMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
      b735f41d
  20. 29 Jan, 2019 1 commit
  21. 23 Jan, 2019 1 commit
  22. 14 Jan, 2019 1 commit
  23. 08 Jan, 2019 1 commit
  24. 13 Dec, 2018 1 commit
  25. 12 Dec, 2018 1 commit
  26. 20 Nov, 2018 1 commit
  27. 19 Nov, 2018 1 commit
    • Dmitry Osipenko's avatar
      regulator: Change regulator-coupled-max-spread property · a8d8ee43
      Dmitry Osipenko authored and Mark Brown's avatar Mark Brown committed
      
      
      Redefine binding for regulator-coupled-max-spread property in a way that
      max-spread values are defined per regulator couple instead of defining
      single max-spread for the whole group of coupled regulators.
      
      With that change the following regulators coupling configuration will be
      possible:
      
      regA: regulatorA {
      	regulator-coupled-with = <&regB &regC>;
      	regulator-coupled-max-spread = <100000 300000>;
      };
      
      regB: regulatorB {
      	regulator-coupled-with = <&regA &regC>;
      	regulator-coupled-max-spread = <100000 200000>;
      };
      
      regC: regulatorC {
      	regulator-coupled-with = <&regA &regB>;
      	regulator-coupled-max-spread = <300000 200000>;
      };
      
      Note that the regulator-coupled-max-spread property does not have any
      users yet, hence it's okay to change the binding.
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: Mark Brown's avatarMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
      a8d8ee43
  28. 13 Nov, 2018 1 commit