-
Vincent Stehle authored
Currently we read db1 and db2 from the log and sequence files respectively. Then we compute a cross_check database with all the tests, which have run, as well as a would_not_run database with all the tests sets, which have not run. Combine those databases into a unified cross_check database and get rid of would_not_run. We create artificial test entries for the dropped tests sets. While at it, we keep the spurious run tests, if any, and mark them as such. The benefits are that we do not need special handling for dropped tests sets down the pipe anymore, and that our future configuration file filtering rules will also apply to spurious and dropped tests. Signed-off-by: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@arm.com>
62552997