Commit f19e4ed1 authored by Al Viro's avatar Al Viro Committed by Christoph Hellwig
Browse files

configfs_register_group() shouldn't be (and isn't) called in rmdirable parts

revert cc57c073

 "configfs: fix registered group removal"
It was an attempt to handle something that fundamentally doesn't
work - configfs_register_group() should never be done in a part
of tree that can be rmdir'ed.  And in mainline it never had been,
so let's not borrow trouble; the fix was racy anyway, it would take
a lot more to make that work and desired semantics is not clear.

Signed-off-by: default avatarAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
parent ff4dd081
......@@ -1771,16 +1771,6 @@ void configfs_unregister_group(struct config_group *group)
struct dentry *dentry = group->cg_item.ci_dentry;
struct dentry *parent = group->cg_item.ci_parent->ci_dentry;
mutex_lock(&subsys->su_mutex);
if (!group->cg_item.ci_parent->ci_group) {
/*
* The parent has already been unlinked and detached
* due to a rmdir.
*/
goto unlink_group;
}
mutex_unlock(&subsys->su_mutex);
inode_lock_nested(d_inode(parent), I_MUTEX_PARENT);
spin_lock(&configfs_dirent_lock);
configfs_detach_prep(dentry, NULL);
......@@ -1796,7 +1786,6 @@ void configfs_unregister_group(struct config_group *group)
dput(dentry);
mutex_lock(&subsys->su_mutex);
unlink_group:
unlink_group(group);
mutex_unlock(&subsys->su_mutex);
}
......
Supports Markdown
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment